Close Please enter your Username and Password


RickySpin01 73M
3935 posts
11/19/2010 9:23 pm
Texas businessman settles military food mislabeling case for $15 million


This person, his family and his company got away with selling bad food to American Troops under the Bush Administration and has been prosecuted under the Obama Administration.

Makes me wonder how much this person, his family and his company gave in campaign donations and to which party? Of course thanks to the Supreme Court we can’t tell. I am ready for the usual gang of fools to tell me down is up; black is white and wrong is right.


Texas businessman settles military food mislabeling case for $15 million

Prosecutors allege that Samir Mahmoud Itani and his company American Grocers Ltd. changed the "use-by" labels on food and sold it to the U.S. military from 2003 to 2006 during the Iraq war.

By P.J. Huffstutter and Andrew Blankstein, Los Angeles Times
November 20, 2010

A Texas businessman has agreed to pay $15 million to settle federal allegations that he and his company cheated the government by selling old and potentially dangerous food to the U.S. military to supply combat troops serving in Iraq and elsewhere.

Prosecutors had alleged that Samir Mahmoud Itani and his company American Grocers Ltd. profited from the Middle East conflict by ripping off taxpayers and shortchanging U.S. soldiers in the mess hall. According to the government, Itani's firm bought deeply discounted products whose freshness dates had expired or were nearing expiration. His workers then altered those dates and resold those supplies to the government for hefty markups, prosecutors alleged.

On Friday, Department of Justice officials announced that Itani, his wife, Suzanne, his brother Ziad and the company agreed to pay the penalty to settle the false-claim charges in this federal whistle-blower case.

Suzanne Itani, chief executive of American Grocers, said in a statement that the company denied any wrongdoing and that the settlement was a way to avoid lengthy litigation. She said that the company was "proud of the service and products it delivers to its customers" and that company officials "look forward to returning our full attention to serving our many loyal customers throughout the world."

Samir Itani could not be reached for comment. According to property records, he owns a $2.2-million, 9,931-square-foot mansion with two elevators in an upscale Houston neighborhood.
Prosecutors said that Samir Itani, 51, and a tightknit group of family and business acquaintances sold at least $36 million worth of mislabeled food products to the government.

The shopping list was long and included potato flakes, salad dressing, produce, peanut butter, lobster and hamburger patties, according to the federal complaint. The supplies flowed out of Texas and to bases across the Middle East from about 2003 to 2006 during the Iraq war.

As the U.S. military presence grew in the Middle East, Itani's business boomed. American Grocers shipped so much stale merchandise that the company bought paint solvent by the barrel and set up assembly lines to wipe out the old labels to make room for the phony dates, according to the complaint.
The Justice Department did not say whether any troops were sickened by the food supplied by American Grocers, or whether any of the food companies that sold items to Itani knew of any wrongdoing.

The civil settlement offers a window into the complex logistics used to get supplies to combat troops, and shows, according to investigators, how easy it is to exploit that system. The case is connected to a broader, ongoing inquiry by the Justice Department into the nation's network of military food suppliers.

Last year, Itani pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy to defraud the government by overcharging for bogus transportation fees to ship the food. He is scheduled to be sentence in that case in U.S. District Court in Houston next month.

Prosecutors may have opted to pursue civil charges in the labeling case because the burden of proof is lower than in a criminal proceeding, legal experts said. The government has barred Itani, his wife and American Grocers from receiving any future federal contracts.

According to the civil complaint, Itani's privately held American Grocers purchased staples nearing or past their "use by" dates from some of the country's leading food manufacturers, including Kraft Foods International Inc. and ConAgra Foodservice.
After trucks unloaded the goods at the company's warehouse, an assembly line of as many as 30 employees used buckets of acetone —a key ingredient in paint thinner and nail polish remover — black spray paint or a small tool to erase the expiration dates, according to court documents and the whistle-blower.

New dates were then printed out or stamped onto new stickers showing that the food had an additional nine to 18 months of shelf life, prosecutors alleged. The food was then packed into air freight or sea containers and sent overseas.
So much acetone was used inside the firm's Houston warehouse that it "smelled strong" like being inside a nail salon, recalled Delma Pallares, a former sales manager and the whistle-blower in the civil case.

One invoice, filed as an exhibit in the case, appeared to show instructions to employees to alter the labels on 750 pounds of frozen trout, giving the fish another nine months of shelf life. As much as 2,500 pounds of frozen Jennie-O brand boneless turkey breasts appeared to have been given another year.
One order of Kraft cheese arrived already months past its use-by date, according to Pallares. New labels were put on the boxes, she said, before the cheese was shipped out.

"We are feeling very satisfied … that the filing has been unsealed and the public can view what we've been investigating for the past five years," said Joel Androphy, Pallares' attorney.
The complaint accused Itani, his wife and his brother of making false claims and using falsified documents to make those claims. The three and the company were also accused of violating the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and causing their customers to violate the act.

"Companies that provide supplies to our men and women in uniform must be held to a high standard," Tony West, assistant attorney general for the civil division of the Justice Department, said in a statement. "We will be vigilant in protecting taxpayer funds from fraud, especially where the fraud relates to contracts meant to support our troops."

According to court documents, American Grocers got its start at least 15 years ago by working with large grocery retailers and other firms that catered to American expatriates working in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere in the Middle East. In 2003, it began supplying food products to government contractors including Public Warehousing Co., the largest supplier of food for U.S. troops in Iraq and Kuwait.

A federal grand jury in Atlanta last year indicted Public Warehousing for what prosecutors allege was a "massive overcharging" of the U.S. government that may have cost taxpayers more than $1 billion. The company, which changed its name to Agility, has denied the charges.

Food safety experts say the civil case raises concern over quality control procedures for what is being served to military personnel, particularly those under the stress of combat.
"At best, you can say they were given spoiled food if it was not handled properly," said Robert Brackett, former director of the federal Food and Drug Administration's food safety center. Brackett added, "The military is a sensitive population. They have a limited source of foods they can trust, and this is one of them."

Manufacturers put "sell by" or "use by" dates on their products to tell consumers how long they have until the food loses its best flavor. The dates usually refer to quality, not safety.
However, food safety ultimately comes down to an equation of time and temperature, said David Acheson, former assistant commissioner for food protection at the FDA under President George W. Bush. When exposed to extreme temperatures or other hazards over time, he said, contamination can occur or be exacerbated.

If food has spent several days at higher temperatures and the "use by" dates have been altered, "then you're under the misperception that you have more lead time with it," Acheson said. "But you don't. You don't know when your true starting point is."

Skipper_too 68G

11/19/2010 9:53 pm

The crooks and their enablers are beyond shameful conduct. I wonder why we don't see KBR and Halliburton investigated for overcharging for goods and services.


RickySpin01 73M

11/19/2010 11:22 pm

    Quoting Skipper_too:
    The crooks and their enablers are beyond shameful conduct. I wonder why we don't see KBR and Halliburton investigated for overcharging for goods and services.
The investigation of KBR division of Halliburton began under Democratic control of the Senate. I blogged extensively about this “WHERE YOUR MONEY GOES.” About 20% of the MONEY paid by Americans to pay "contractors" in Afghanistan has simply been handed out as bribes by KBR, etc. al. to the Taliban. Not to mention the American troops electrocuted in their showers by sloppy work.


60minman2 84M

11/20/2010 6:05 am

The USDA Vetinerary service is charged with food safety of the vendors it procures food from. Inspectors are assigned to moniter processing plants, wharehouses and packing companies of all vendors supplying food items to the government. Seems like there was a breakdown in that system. The investigators do indeed need to pursue this company but also investigate why the system to prevent this sort of activity occured in the first place. Very interesting blog.....

Its time to start reading the Bible, It will scare the Hell out of you...


RickySpin01 73M

11/20/2010 7:11 am

    Quoting 60minman2:
    The USDA Vetinerary service is charged with food safety of the vendors it procures food from. Inspectors are assigned to moniter processing plants, wharehouses and packing companies of all vendors supplying food items to the government. Seems like there was a breakdown in that system. The investigators do indeed need to pursue this company but also investigate why the system to prevent this sort of activity occured in the first place. Very interesting blog.....
This was not a mere breakdown of the system. This was wholesale looting of the American Treasury. Why did it happen? Follow the campaign money trail. Can’t do that? How about if John Yoo writes a memo?


RickySpin01 73M

11/20/2010 7:21 am

    Quoting  :

I wish I could add to your comment but you have hit every nail squarely on the head.


RickySpin01 73M

11/20/2010 7:28 am

Here is an update:

WASHINGTON (AFP) – A US grocer who pled guilty to defrauding the government on contracts to supply food to troops in the Middle East will pay 15 million dollars to settle the case, officials said Friday.

Samir Itani and his Houston-based company American Grocers Ltd (AG are accused of adding in bogus trucking costs, concealing discounts from suppliers and falsifying health certificates and halal certificates that proved meat was in compliance with Islamic dietary laws.

The government also accused AGL of altering shelf-life dates on some food items to make them seem fresher, the Justice Department said.

Itani pled guilty to conspiring to defraud the government by submitting false claims, but has not yet been sentenced.

"Companies that provide supplies to our men and women in uniform must be held to a high standard," said Tony West, assistant attorney general for the department's civil division.

"We will be vigilant in protecting taxpayer funds from fraud, especially where the fraud relates to contracts meant to support our troops."

AGL could not immediately be reached for comment.


Rentier1

11/20/2010 7:42 am

It's an old tradition. Look at the tainted beef scandals of a hundred years ago.


RickySpin01 73M

11/20/2010 7:47 am

    Quoting  :

Your attempt to censor a comment in my blog is inappropriate, unwelcome and has been removed. Satisfy your compulsive need to control others elsewhere.


RickySpin01 73M

11/20/2010 12:02 pm

    Quoting Rentier1:
    It's an old tradition. Look at the tainted beef scandals of a hundred years ago.
I agree with you that immoral individuals have committed treason in the past such as J.P. Morgan selling barrels of sawdust to the Union Army as gunpowder or Henry Ford aiding the Nazis; however, this is a contemporary event facilitated by the legal bribery of hidden campaign money facilitated by overtly unreasoned, fascist Supreme Court decisions.


RickySpin01 73M

11/20/2010 4:44 pm

    Quoting  :

You are totally correct; the barn door was wide open and is now, hopefully, closed. Itani and his company American Grocers Ltd committed crimes beginning in 2003. Republican George W. Bush was President of the United States and there was a Republican Majority in the House and the Senate.

In 2006 there was a Democratic majority in the House and the Senate and Itani’s crimes stopped. President Barak Obama is the duly elected Democratic President of the United States and Itani has been fined and is awaiting sentencing.

So back to my original question: Which party do you think Itani, his company and his family were most likely to make untraceable campaign donations too? The Republican Party that threw open the barn doors and shoveled the money to criminals such as Itani or the Democratic Party that has closed the doors and prosecuted the crimes?


RickySpin01 73M

11/20/2010 4:45 pm

    Quoting  :

I know it is amazing to me. A foreign born domestic terrorist sells dangerous food to American troops. Maybe if we allowed Dick Cheney to water board Itani the Lebanese money connection will be revealed? The same Lebanese money connection that forced our troops to be exposed to an obsolete, ineffective and potentially debilitating Anthrax vaccine.


RickySpin01 73M

11/20/2010 8:54 pm

    Quoting  :

You are most correct and that is a subject for a future blog.


60minman2 84M

11/21/2010 7:59 am

quoting Bob....."ET, absolutely nothing was stated in the blog, or any of the comments that preceded your last one, to connect Palin to any of the activity discussed in the blog.

Your mentioning her appears to be an out of context remark fostered by your intense dislike of her, rather than having anything to do with the blog.Be careful...people get blocked from blogs for doing that."

Actually Bob others can get away with it as long as they fawn over the blogger. Only disagreements get banned and/or deleted......

Its time to start reading the Bible, It will scare the Hell out of you...


RickySpin01 73M

11/21/2010 2:02 pm

    Quoting 60minman2:
    quoting Bob....."ET, absolutely nothing was stated in the blog, or any of the comments that preceded your last one, to connect Palin to any of the activity discussed in the blog.

    Your mentioning her appears to be an out of context remark fostered by your intense dislike of her, rather than having anything to do with the blog.Be careful...people get blocked from blogs for doing that."

    Actually Bob others can get away with it as long as they fawn over the blogger. Only disagreements get banned and/or deleted......
You may think yourself clever or perhaps even loyal defending the overbearing and obnoxious actions of others, however, all you have demonstrated is how lustily you revel in wallowing in the urine pool of ignorance you mistake for knowledge.