Blogs > spiritwoman45 > Life in the Canyon |
Just an Observation As a life long student of human behavior I frequently find my self looking for the patterns, trends. I was restless and couldn't sleep last night but not really up to doing much so I took on a silly project to amuse myself - go through the recent attack blogs and look for patterns. Political differences are the obvious common denominator BUT almost 95% of the hateful interchanges are started by men attacking women. In recent stuff I only found hateful, hurtful interchange initiated by a women. The ladies can certainly do a good job of defending themselves but men are the primary instigators. I went back through my stuff. Lots of people disagreeing or presenting another side but the only insulting comments were from men. Maybe things haven't really changed since grade school after all. Maybe it's just our animal selves showing through - but wait, in most other species males attack males. ...............And people ask why I am single by choice. Spiritwoman ^i^ |
|||
9/1/2012 1:25 pm |
Not happy to agree, but I think it's true. Probably due to higher levels of testosterone. GREETINGS EARTHLINGS! I COME IN PEACE! TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER. Klatu, baraba nicto.
| ||
9/1/2012 1:28 pm |
Are you saying that the three blogs attacking me and using my username was instigated by me? Where in the hell do you get off? Or do those three particular blogs not count? You're nothing but a full fledged hypocrite attacking all the men here. Human behaviors azz. Teddy-ess and hairee, We need (An update on the situation here.) ROTFLMFAO
| ||
9/1/2012 2:11 pm |
I'm sure you'll say this doesn't exist; [post 153128] Teddy-ess and hairee, We need (An update on the situation here.) ROTFLMFAO
| ||
9/1/2012 2:12 pm |
And I created this too by your book; [post 153147] Teddy-ess and hairee, We need (An update on the situation here.) ROTFLMFAO
| ||
9/1/2012 2:15 pm |
And this one wasn't designed to attack either was it? [post 153096] Not counting another one she deleted. Teddy-ess and hairee, We need (An update on the situation here.) ROTFLMFAO
| ||
9/1/2012 2:18 pm |
Hi Spirit: I have the same observations. There are only one or two women who ingratiate themselves to these married male bullies and seem to delight in their hate-filled blogs and insults towards the women. There are a few nice married men on this site, but for the rest of the miserable married men here I think they should delete their profiles immediately and spend that time with their wives. So many marriages these days have failed because the husband became involved with another woman he met via the internet. If I met a man through an internet dating group and we got married, I can't even imagine my husband staying on as a member here.
| ||
9/1/2012 2:20 pm |
All those blogs I listed above are just an observation that really leads me to believe that the women here are not miss goody two shoe's. There are many more comments by women here that I could list in full assault attack mode on men here, but it would take me a week to list them all. Get your facts more straight on your biased out look on human behavior with some of the womens blogs and their comments around here. Teddy-ess and hairee, We need (An update on the situation here.) ROTFLMFAO
| ||
9/1/2012 2:21 pm |
This "study" of trends and patterns is absolutely meaningless unless you identify which blogs you are talking about. Also, do you fairly evaluate your female friend's comments as attacks or do you just look more for negativity from the males? How many attack blogs did you examine to come up with the 95% figure? I could easily post this: "Political differences are the obvious common denominator BUT almost 95% of the hateful interchanges are started by women attacking men. In recent stuff I only found hateful, hurtful interchange initiated by a woman. The men can certainly do a good job of defending themselves but women are the primary instigators. I went back through my stuff. Lots of people disagreeing or presenting another side but the only insulting comments were from women." Do you see what I mean? Without some sort of reference only one thing is clear and that is that your "study" is no more valid than the imaginary one I just referenced. Fossil I only looked at the last 3 - 4 days for general information but I did look at all of them. This is a specific interval of time but one in which there has been a lot of nastiness. A different time period would might reflect no meanness or nastiness what so ever with 0 in each column. I went back a of weeks personal stuff since obviously there wasn't as much to go through. Hardly scientific method - just some columns and hash marks to check off male or female. I doubt I could have used it for a project in my methods of research class. As I said - just an observation I don't think any of the journals will be interested in publishing. Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 2:23 pm |
Not happy to agree, but I think it's true. Probably due to higher levels of testosterone. Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 2:28 pm |
Hi Spirit: I have the same observations. There are only one or two women who ingratiate themselves to these married male bullies and seem to delight in their hate-filled blogs and insults towards the women. There are a few nice married men on this site, but for the rest of the miserable married men here I think they should delete their profiles immediately and spend that time with their wives. So many marriages these days have failed because the husband became involved with another woman he met via the internet. If I met a man through an internet dating group and we got married, I can't even imagine my husband staying on as a member here. Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 2:34 pm |
And this one wasn't designed to attack either was it? [post 153096] Not counting another one she deleted. By the way I do like your hen house analogy. I have a scar in one eyebrow that came from disripting the hens when I was a kid. After that I just stayed iut of the hen nouse. Don't worry - I'll take a sleeping pill tonight. Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 2:40 pm |
For me single works well. I was married for over 20 years to a wonderful man who respected all people including women. I know a few now too. Now if they were available and willing they might change my mind. Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 2:45 pm |
Well, I'm confused. Here's a quote from a few lines of your blog: "I only found hateful, hurtful interchange initiated by a women. The ladies can certainly do a good job of defending themselves but men are the primary instigators." I'm assuming women in the first sentence means the plural of woman, therefore more than one woman. Then it says they were "intitiated by a women" (sic). Next sentence= "men are the primary instigators". How can the women be the intiators and men be the instigators. Would this not be equally guilty???? Androgel is a good testosterone replacement BTW. AZ
| ||
9/1/2012 2:49 pm |
Good point. I wonder about some handles too - both make and female. Perhaps since handles allow people to be anything they want some are acting out their masculine or feminine sides. Then it could b something like when I recently told a male friend that I had never read the owner's manual for my car. He said "You're a real guy, aren't you?" Another male friend once called me "Annie Oakley" becasue I defied his idea of what a woman should be. But - as several men on her can attest to I have all female parts. Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 2:52 pm |
For petes sake why dont you two people just get married and take your fight to court.
| ||
|
I joined this site about 6 or so years ago so that I could chat to people, make new friends, to pass quiet evenings, and to have FUN. I think that the vast majority joined for similar reasons. I'm going back to having FUN, FUN, FUN!!!
| ||
9/1/2012 3:30 pm |
The scratching brood. Teddy-ess and hairee, We need (An update on the situation here.) ROTFLMFAO
| ||
9/1/2012 4:06 pm |
Not happy to agree, but I think it's true. Probably due to higher levels of testosterone. How would you explain that?
| ||
9/1/2012 4:29 pm |
LOL to both Anzalady and FreshEmerald!! GREETINGS EARTHLINGS! I COME IN PEACE! TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER. Klatu, baraba nicto.
| ||
|
Are you saying that the three blogs attacking me and using my username was instigated by me? Where in the hell do you get off? Or do those three particular blogs not count? You're nothing but a full fledged hypocrite attacking all the men here. Human behaviors azz. Live today as if it is your last For tomorrow will soon be in the past
| ||
9/1/2012 4:55 pm |
Well, I just shaved my beard (for the second time today). How would you explain that? Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 4:59 pm |
Well, I'm confused. Here's a quote from a few lines of your blog: "I only found hateful, hurtful interchange initiated by a women. The ladies can certainly do a good job of defending themselves but men are the primary instigators." I'm assuming women in the first sentence means the plural of woman, therefore more than one woman. Then it says they were "intitiated by a women" (sic). Next sentence= "men are the primary instigators". How can the women be the intiators and men be the instigators. Would this not be equally guilty???? Androgel is a good testosterone replacement BTW. AZ Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 5:00 pm |
Good to see you here. With all you have been dealing with the crap here is the last thing you need. Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 5:02 pm |
I joined this site about 6 or so years ago so that I could chat to people, make new friends, to pass quiet evenings, and to have FUN. I think that the vast majority joined for similar reasons. I'm going back to having FUN, FUN, FUN!!! Spiritwoman ^i^
| ||
9/1/2012 5:39 pm |
Those may be replies because you have blocked them. Teddy-ess and hairee, We need (An update on the situation here.) ROTFLMFAO
|
×
×