Close Please enter your Username and Password

My Blog

Welcome to my blog!

Todays Americana Question
Posted:Jul 16, 2018 5:08 am
Last Updated:Jul 16, 2018 10:27 am
39 Views

A total change of pace with this one.

Which technology company was originally named "Cadabra"?
Facebook
Netflix
Amazon
Google
I don't know
3 Comments , 7 votes
A Russian Ham Sandwich
Posted:Jul 15, 2018 8:36 am
Last Updated:Jul 16, 2018 4:05 am
98 Views

If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything.

Maybe there is something to these charges. I don’t know, and to be honest, I don’t care. I do know the old saying that a prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich, proving those charges are something else entirely.

What the Russians are alleged to have done amounts to nothing – Facebook posts, fake social media accounts, etc. It’s nothing 12-year-olds couldn’t do, and likely do regularly.

The one thing they are alleged to have done that is serious is hacking the servers of the Democratic National Committee. That’s a serious charge. It’s also completely unprovable, which makes it a brilliant political move by Mueller.

It’s a serious charge. But if any of the people charged with doing it were to show up in court, which is highly unlikely, their lawyers would demand to see the DNC’s servers so they could have their experts examine them. Mueller says Russians hacked them, but the servers have magically disappeared. So how can anyone be certain who hacked them, or if they were even really hacked at all?

Since none of those charged are going to show up in court, there will be no challenge to the allegation, no demand to see the evidence, and no legal embarrassment for Mueller when the charges are dropped because the key piece of evidence not only can’t be provided to the defense, it wasn’t even examined by the prosecutor. He appears to have simply taken the word of the Democratic Party about what happened.

Democrats, naturally, have a vested interest in advancing a story of Russian hacking costing Hillary Clinton the election because the alternative is she was a horrible candidate, the American people wanted nothing to do with her or her ideas, and they ran an awful campaign.

The fact that their “hacked” server disappeared should be a red flag. It’d be like someone claiming they cleaned up a murder scene they stumbled across before calling the police because they’re a neat freak, not because they’re trying to cover up their guilt.
This “problem” with the server having vanished won’t be an issue because there’s no one to make it an issue. But there are plenty of people willing to exploit the charges because this is Washington, and Washington doesn’t need proof or have standards when there is a narrative or an agenda to advance.

And let’s not forget that John Podesta’s email password was “password,” and he gave it to a hacker by falling for a fishing email. Not exactly James Bond-level spying.

But first remember no votes were changed, and nothing related to voting or vote counting was “hacked,” even though Democrats and media like to fudge that fact. Second, if you want to protect the integrity of the election bring back paper ballots and require photo ID.

Liberals love to talk about the importance of the integrity of the vote, but they aren’t willing to do literally the least they could do to protect it by requiring people to prove they are who they say they are when they show up at the polls.

In the end, this will likely amount to nothing. There are show trials and show indictments. What happened Friday appears to be the latter, especially since there will never be a trial. But there sure will be a lot of campaign commercials.

In part from article by Derek Hunter
7 Comments
Yesterdays Answer
Posted:Jul 14, 2018 3:48 am
Last Updated:Jul 14, 2018 3:50 am
43 Views

Thomas Edison

Thomas Alva Edison began his working life selling newspapers on the Grand Trunk Railroad as a way to fund his scientific experiments. He eventually found work as a telegraph operator all over the Central Western United States, and favored the night shift as it gave him the chance to conduct his experiments during his free time in between messages. He was known for being more engrossed in his science experiments than in his job - one manager described him as always having his nose buried in a copy of "Scientific American", and he would take time off from work to purchase chemicals for his experiments, and leave forgotten wires and jars in his wake. His constant moonlighting got him into trouble on at least one occasion, when a mishap cost him his job at the Associated Press Bureau in Louisville. As he recalled years later, "I went one night into the battery-room to obtain some sulfuric acid for experimenting. The carboy tipped over, the acid ran out, went through to the manager's room below, and ate up his desk and all the carpet. The next morning I was summoned before him, and told that what the company wanted was operators, not experimenters. I was at liberty to take my pay and get out."

Edison eventually left telegraphy entirely and established a laboratory in Menlo Park, New Jersey to devote all of his time to his inventions. His efforts in developing an inexpensive way to mass produce light bulbs led to the formation of the Edison Electric Light Company, which was the predecessor to the General Electric Company. Edison famously registered over a thousand patents in his lifetime, and was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame in 1973 for his work on electric lighting, motion pictures, and the phonograph.
1 comment
Hypocrisy On Display
Posted:Jul 13, 2018 9:56 am
Last Updated:Jul 15, 2018 8:09 am
192 Views

If a person stands against
a Judge simply because
the Judge supports the
Constitution as written,
then the person undeniably
stand against the Constitution
as written.

Democratic member of Congress
Didn't you swear an oath to
defend the Constitution?
17 Comments
Todays Americana Question
Posted:Jul 13, 2018 5:25 am
Last Updated:Jul 14, 2018 3:47 am
76 Views

He was working as a telegraph operator in Louisville, Kentucky in 1867, but his main focus was his experiments. He spilled some acid in the battery room which ate through the floor and damaged his manager's office below, and the next day he got a pink slip. He went on to become a well-known inventor and founded several successful businesses, including the General Electric Company. Who is he?
Alfred Nobel
Nikola Tesla
Henry Ford
Thomas Edison
I don't know
1 comment , 9 votes
Yesterdays Answer
Posted:Jul 13, 2018 5:22 am
Last Updated:Jul 13, 2018 5:22 am
44 Views

Harry Truman

Franklin Delano Roosevelt died less than three months into his fourth term as U.S. Presidents; Harry Truman took over and served the remainder, followed by another full term.
1 comment
Todays Americana Question
Posted:Jul 12, 2018 4:04 am
Last Updated:Jul 13, 2018 5:21 am
86 Views

Of the Presidents who served more than 4 years, but less than 2 full terms.

Which one served served the longest: 7 years, 9 months, 8 days?
Harry Truman
Abraham Lincoln
William McKinley
Richard Nixon
I don't know
2 Comments , 6 votes
Yesterdays Answer
Posted:Jul 12, 2018 3:41 am
Last Updated:Jul 12, 2018 3:42 am
51 Views

Theodore Roosevelt Roosevelt was rewarded for his efforts in helping to end the Russian-Japanese conflict in 1906. Gore won in 2007 for his efforts to help stop global warming. Truman never won the award, and Burr pre-dates it by nearly 100 years
1 comment
Survey Says
Posted:Jul 11, 2018 7:40 pm
Last Updated:Jul 12, 2018 2:33 pm
139 Views

A recent study has found that
Women who carry around a
little extra weight live longer
than the men who mention it.
12 Comments
Defiant to the END
Posted:Jul 11, 2018 6:49 am
Last Updated:Jul 11, 2018 10:01 am
111 Views

Former FBI attorney Lisa Page will defy a congressional subpoena to appear for a deposition on Wednesday, her lawyer said in a statement.

The House Judiciary and House Oversight & Government Reform Committees issued the subpoena to Page, who has been at the center of controversy over anti-Trump text messages that she exchanged with Peter Strzok, the former deputy chief of the FBI’s counterintelligence division.

Page and Strzok worked on the Hillary Clinton email investigation as well as the probe into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

In my humble opinion Congress should issue an order of Contempt of Congress and arrest her. If I dared defy a Congressional subpoena I would be arrested and charged No one is above the law - find her and make her testify Justice transcends politics. Arrest her dumb butt.
3 Comments

To link to this blog (bigblock46) use [blog bigblock46] in your messages.